Skip to main content

WARN Act Layoffs in Kenosha County, Wisconsin

WARN Act mass layoff and plant closure notices in Kenosha County, Wisconsin, updated daily.

2
Notices (2026)
82
Workers Affected
Fresenius USA MFG
Biggest Filing (41)
Manufacturing
Top Industry

Latest WARN Notices in Kenosha County

WARN Act layoff notices
CompanyCityEmployeesNotice DateType
Fresenius USA MFGKenosha41Layoff
H4 LogisticsKenosha41Closure
Kroger Fulfillment NetworkPleasant Prairie211Closure
Northlake EngineeringBristol36Closure
Allied PlasticsTwin Lakes132
Bradshaw Medical Inc., DBA IntechKenosha37
Monitronics International, Inc., DBA Brinks HomeKenosha1
GXO LogisticsKenosha123
Biomat USAKenosha33Closure
Kenosha Estates Nursing and RehabKenosha65Closure
Mondi AkrosilPleasant Prairie108
EfsKenosha10Closure
Progressive Parking SolutionsKenosha2Closure
Mondi AkrosilPleasant Prairie92Closure
APL Logistics Warehouse Management ServicesPleasant Prairie86Closure
eImprovementPleasant Prairie60Closure
Cinemark USAKenosha51Closure
OemmccoKenosha49Closure
Transform KMKenosha70Closure
Chancery Pub and RestaurantKenosha77Closure

In-Depth Analysis: Layoffs in Kenosha County, Wisconsin

# Economic Analysis: Layoff Trends in Kenosha County, Wisconsin

Overview: Scale and Significance of Workforce Reductions

Kenosha County has experienced substantial workforce disruption over the past decade, with 30 WARN (Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification) notices affecting 2,161 workers. While this represents a concentrated impact within a county of roughly 170,000 residents, the scale becomes more significant when viewed through the lens of the county's industrial composition and recent labor market dynamics. The average layoff event in Kenosha County has displaced approximately 72 workers per notice, suggesting that these are primarily medium-to-large-scale workforce reductions rather than scattered small closures.

Set against Wisconsin's current labor market conditions—where the insured unemployment rate stands at 1.02% and the state unemployment rate sits at 3.4%—Kenosha County's accumulated layoffs represent a meaningful economic headwind. The county has absorbed these displacements across diverse sectors, from manufacturing to logistics to information technology, indicating systemic pressures rather than sector-specific distress. The fact that initial jobless claims in Wisconsin have declined 66.3% year-over-year suggests that the broader labor market has been absorbing workers, but the concentration of Kenosha County layoffs warrants closer examination of what's driving these reductions and whether recovery mechanisms are adequately supporting affected workers.

Key Employers: Corporate Drivers of Workforce Contraction

Mondi Akrosil emerges as the leading source of WARN notices in Kenosha County, having filed two separate notices that collectively displaced 200 workers. The company's multiple filings suggest either staged reductions or ongoing restructuring rather than a single catastrophic closure. Mondi, a multinational manufacturer headquartered in Austria with operations spanning packaging and engineered materials, has been navigating global supply chain pressures and shifting demand patterns in specialty packaging markets.

ACCO Brands, the office products and supplies manufacturer, also filed two WARN notices affecting 80 workers. The company has faced sustained headwinds in its core markets as enterprises continue transitioning to digital workflows and remote work arrangements that reduce demand for traditional office supplies and organizational products.

Single-notice employers with substantial impact include Kroger Fulfillment Network (211 workers), which appears to be rationalizing its logistics footprint across the Midwest amid evolving fulfillment strategies; American Girl (185 workers), the toy manufacturer facing secular decline in traditional doll markets; and United Solutions (161 workers), a plastic products manufacturer contending with material cost volatility and shifting consumer preferences toward sustainable alternatives.

Allied Plastics (132 workers), GXO Logistics (123 workers), and Black Horse Carriers (107 workers) round out the major displacement events. GXO Logistics, which split from XPO Logistics in 2021, has been restructuring operations as it competes in an increasingly competitive third-party logistics market facing margin compression and consolidation pressures. Arvato Digital Services (95 workers) and APL Logistics Warehouse Management Services (86 workers) complete the top ten, both reflecting broader consolidation and automation trends in logistics and business process outsourcing.

The notable absence of Kenosha County's historically dominant employer—automotive manufacturing—from the top WARN filers is striking. While this suggests relative stability in that sector compared to the 2008-2009 recession, it also reflects the ongoing structural shift in the county's economy away from traditional automotive assembly and toward diversified logistics, manufacturing, and service sectors.

Industry Patterns: Sectoral Distribution and Vulnerabilities

Manufacturing accounts for the largest share of WARN notices with nine filings, representing roughly 30% of all notices. This reflects the county's continued reliance on factory production, though the composition has shifted from automotive assembly toward specialty manufacturing (plastics, packaging, consumer goods). The persistence of manufacturing-related layoffs suggests that this sector remains vulnerable to cyclical downturns, automation investments, and global competition.

Transportation and logistics together account for six notices, underscoring how Kenosha County's position along major logistics corridors—particularly its proximity to Milwaukee and Chicago—has made it a regional hub for distribution and warehousing. However, the sector's heavy investment in automation, labor-saving technologies, and optimization algorithms has meant that employment growth has not kept pace with volume growth. Layoffs in this sector often reflect operational efficiency initiatives rather than demand destruction.

Information and Technology represents four notices, a notable figure for a county not typically associated with tech hubs. This likely reflects concentrated closures of back-office operations, customer service centers, and smaller IT services firms. Arvato Digital Services, a major data processing and customer service company, represents a significant share of this sector's disruption.

Retail and Healthcare each account for three notices. The retail disruptions reflect the ongoing structural decline of traditional retail in the face of e-commerce displacement, while healthcare layoffs may signal consolidation, operational restructuring, or shifts in service delivery models within the region's healthcare systems.

Geographic Distribution: Concentration Within County Boundaries

Kenosha city itself accounts for 16 of the 30 notices (53%), concentrating more than half of the county's identified displacement events within the county seat. Pleasant Prairie, an industrial suburb northwest of Kenosha proper, captures 11 notices (37%), making it the second major locus of layoff activity. Together, these two municipalities account for 90% of all WARN filings in the county.

This geographic concentration reflects where Kenosha County's employment base actually resides. Kenosha proper, with approximately 99,000 residents, contains the bulk of the county's corporate headquarters, industrial facilities, and service sector employers. Pleasant Prairie, a village of roughly 20,000 residents, has evolved into a major logistics and light industrial hub, hosting numerous distribution centers and warehousing operations that cluster near I-94 and regional transportation networks.

The remaining municipalities—Wilmot, Twin Lakes, and Bristol—each account for a single notice, indicating that significant employment concentration and thus layoff exposure remains confined to the two urban core areas. This geographic concentration means that workforce adjustment services and recovery programs in Kenosha and Pleasant Prairie bear disproportionate responsibility for supporting affected workers.

Historical Trends: Cyclical and Secular Patterns

The temporal distribution of WARN notices reveals important patterns. The single notice in 2016 likely reflects recovery from the 2008-2009 recession, with labor markets beginning to stabilize. However, the sharp increase to six notices in 2018 and five in 2019 suggests mounting cyclical pressures in the pre-pandemic economy, as companies faced tightening labor markets, trade tensions, and margin compression.

The seven notices filed in 2020—the pandemic year—represent the highest single-year count in the data, reflecting both immediate shutdowns and the subsequent rationalization of operations as businesses adapted to remote work and supply chain disruptions. The sharp decline to one notice in 2021 suggests rapid recovery and rehiring during the initial fiscal stimulus phase.

The subsequent rise to three notices in 2022 and the scatter of filings in 2023, 2024, 2025, and 2026 suggests a return to trend baseline, with ongoing structural adjustments rather than cyclical shock. The fact that Kenosha County had two notices each in 2024, 2025, and 2026 (projected), along with improving unemployment metrics, suggests that the county may be entering a period of labor market stabilization at lower employment levels—meaning that while layoffs continue, they're no longer reflecting crisis-level disruption.

Local Economic Impact: Structural Challenges and Resilience Questions

The cumulative displacement of 2,161 workers across a county with roughly 85,000 jobs (estimated) represents roughly 2.5% of the total employment base. While this percentage may appear modest, the concentration matters significantly. Workers displaced from manufacturing and logistics positions often face substantial wage losses when transitioning to alternative sectors, and geographic mobility constraints limit options for many affected households.

The county's industrial composition—heavily weighted toward manufacturing, logistics, and retail—leaves it vulnerable to automation and efficiency-driven employment declines that will likely accelerate rather than abate. Unlike counties with diversified knowledge-economy bases, Kenosha County lacks a robust network of high-wage professional services, advanced technology firms, or research institutions that could absorb displaced workers at equivalent compensation levels.

The H-1B visa data reveals that while Wisconsin as a whole hosts 38,169 certified H-1B petitions, the major employers of H-1B workers (Infosys, Capgemini, Tata Consultancy Services) are concentrated in other parts of the state, particularly around Madison and Milwaukee. The absence of Kenosha County employers from the top H-1B petitioners list suggests that the county's economy relies primarily on domestic labor markets rather than specialized foreign talent pipelines. This means that when these employers face workforce pressures, they typically reduce headcount rather than pivoting toward visa-sponsored talent strategies.

Conclusion: Navigating Structural Transition

Kenosha County's WARN notice landscape reflects broader economic forces reshaping American manufacturing regions. The prevalence of manufacturing and logistics layoffs, combined with geographic concentration in two municipalities and aging industrial infrastructure, suggests that the county faces a multi-year structural adjustment. While current unemployment rates and jobless claims trends indicate that labor markets are absorbing displaced workers, the quality and wage levels of replacement employment deserve monitoring.

The absence of significant H-1B activity among Kenosha County employers, combined with the prevalence of lower-wage sector employment, suggests limited leverage for capturing high-skill immigration-driven growth. County economic development efforts should focus on workforce retraining infrastructure, supporting entrepreneurship in emerging sectors, and potentially attracting remote-work-enabled companies seeking lower-cost operational bases near Milwaukee and Chicago. Without deliberate economic transition strategies, Kenosha County risks becoming a location of declining employment density and aging workforce composition.